Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2015 7:08:15 GMT -8
I guess lights have, over the years, produced more, but during the right conditions, sugaring can produce hundreds over a few nights. Some species seem to gravitate more towards sugaring at given times. One summer, I got a handful of relicta at the lights, but in three nights, got 86 while sugaring. I had a bunch of friends who wanted relicta that summer, so I had plenty to send. And....the 86 were just the ones I kept....many more were present but in a lesser condition. Most of my junctura, cara, cerogama, and relicta came from sugaring and most of my ilia, coccinata, unijuga, neogama, subnata, and habilis came to lights. The rest are generally a 50/50 ratio of lights to sugaring. My one and only Owl Moth came to sugaring. When I saw that moth among the cats on the tree, I went nuts.....at first I thought I had the world record large cat, but then realized what it was and was more than elated. You are correct when u say conditions have to be right, but when they are, it's often then rock'n and roll'n.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Dec 24, 2015 8:04:22 GMT -8
This zoologogical renaming crap has gotten out of hand. For example, the genus for O. alexandrae has changed four times in fifteen years:( In this particular instance it's really a case of proposing a new name in order to split the species into a separate genus purely on the basis of its size, but not checking first whether the name proposed for it has already been published at generic level. When it was found that the name had already been used the old name had to be replaced with a new one. Of course it is a matter of personal preference whether you BELIEVE it is worth placing in its own genus or not. I should point out that regardless of the names used it is often totally subjective whether or not any species or related group of species should be split from one genus and placed in another. If you agree with the reasons for the separation, then follow the new classification. In some cases there is a really valid reason why a species or group of species moves genus, generally when it is shown that the previous classification includes taxa that do not actually have a direct common ancestor with all of the other members of the genus, which is more recent than all species placed in other genera. An example of subjective splitting is whether or not you PREFER to treat Pterourus, Heraclides, Chilasa etc as genera or as groups or subgenera within genus Papilio. It is really up to YOU which of the two you prefer in this case. An older example of a good reason why it is sometimes actually necessary to change genus names for a particular species is the case of Atrophaneura antenor from Madagascar. It was placed in genus Atrophaneura along with the windmill and batwing species of SE Asia. However, the ancestor of antenor probably diverged before the rest of the Troidini except Battus and so it has a common ancestor with many species that are not placed in genus Atrophaneura, eg. Pachliopta, Parides and the birdwings. This is a clear case where a species has to be moved from the genus it was placed in, and put in a separate genus. The alternative is to put all of the species that were previously considered as belonging to various different genera back into a single genus, which is not really satisfactory. Adam.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2015 8:34:02 GMT -8
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your input and I agree there are times when it is necessary to change a genus with reasons....like your antenor reference. Besides the grand ole O. alexandrae, our Papilio marcellus is another example. Papilio became Graphium, then it became Eurytides.....all in a relatively short period of time. I am, admittedly, more of a lumper than splitter even with ssp. The guidelines for such differentiation seem ambiguous and even the genetic facets are unclear as I've been able to read. The Ornithoptera in particular have been battered with back and forth ssp on and off again designations. I realize that many out there are splitters and that's fine. If splitting or renaming genera is to happen, then a clear set of criteria should be employed by all for the sake of objectivity. O. priamus ....?....aruana. Ssp or form? Look at the croesus group. Check out ten sources and you'll have several interpretations/listings. This has been discussed before and no clear cut solution exists. Remember the O. paradisea arfakensis fiasco........putting it into Troides.....really now. Forgive me, for I'm a bit renaming worn...that's all. And, yes there are many groups that really need organization like Lobobunaea and many more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2015 11:08:10 GMT -8
A few more..... FYI, the two on the upper and middle right were from the sixties and I got them in the 70s from within the US. I'm indeed lucky to have had the chance to nab them when I did. They came from the Butterfly Co., NY back then. I was a teen in those wonderful days.
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Dec 26, 2015 12:39:30 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by trehopr1 on Dec 26, 2015 16:46:41 GMT -8
Oh Bill, how I remember those days of the Butterfly Co. in Far Rockaway New York ! I started purchasing from them in 1974 on thru to 1979. I'll never forget that wonderful catalog of 900 insects from all over the world being offered for sale. How much I desired to purchase an O. alexandrea pair for $125.00. Problem was I was only in high school at the time and had no job or income to pay such a "high price" for a pair of butterflies. That's not the first time I've had a chance at securing myself a pair of alexandrea. But, it certainly is one of the better bargains I've missed out on due to bad timing or lack of money or both.
|
|
|
|
Post by beetlehorn on Dec 26, 2015 16:57:51 GMT -8
Too bad that company is no longer in business. After seeing Bill's Catocalas, I just had to share a few of my own. Here are two 24X24 inch drawers.
|
|
|
Post by trehopr1 on Dec 26, 2015 16:58:30 GMT -8
Timmsyrj, I have to say it just "boggles the mind" that you are able to have the generally large series of things that you do. I mean it's not like you just go out in your backyard and bait trap em'. Many of these species you have posted (at least in A1 condition) cost some real cash to own. And while most of us might afford a pair at best --- you seem to have 8 or 10 pairs ! Just staggering. But, more power too you if you can do it. I'm sure all have been well earned. Bravo !
|
|
|
Post by trehopr1 on Dec 26, 2015 17:38:39 GMT -8
Beetlehorn, it looks like you do quite a nice job on the preparation of your Catocala. I also like that you show a closed wing example of each different species. Nice touch...
|
|
|
Post by beetlehorn on Dec 26, 2015 19:18:54 GMT -8
Thanks for the compliment trehopr1. I like to display certain species the way you would encounter them in the wild. I was inspired to do this one day while "tree tapping".(see my video on this collecting method on youtube or this forum). I try to do some of this each summer if I can. In the following photos I have several species of Red Catocala, which were all collected East of the Mississippi. I found some locations in the Mississippi bottomlands of Western Tennessee, where I encountered Catocala carissima, Catocala amatrix(both nominate and form "nurus"), while tapping Cypris and Tupelo trees wearing knee-high rubber boots and keeping an eye out for Cottonmouth snakes(a poisonous pit viper of Eastern swamplands). In the second photo I condensed several species and their variations for a closer look. Tom
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2015 19:27:32 GMT -8
Love the pics......especially the closeup. Those are indeed gorgeous moths....and to think that some of them we may have collected together on one of our many outings. These moths are a blast whether caught from lights, tapping, or sugaring. Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Dec 27, 2015 0:25:18 GMT -8
Timmsyrj, I have to say it just "boggles the mind" that you are able to have the generally large series of things that you do. I mean it's not like you just go out in your backyard and bait trap em'. Many of these species you have posted (at least in A1 condition) cost some real cash to own. And while most of us might afford a pair at best --- you seem to have 8 or 10 pairs ! Just staggering. But, more power too you if you can do it. I'm sure all have been well earned. Bravo ! Where possible, especially with ranched species like the Ornithoptera, I buy in bulk, I've had 4 orders with I.F.T.A over 6 years before they finished, each for around £2,000 ( at one point it was $2 to the £1) so I got good value, one order had 125 pairs of Ornithoptera priamus s.sp ( urvilleanus, caelestis, demophanes, bornemanni and poseidon) I've bought in goliath, chimaera and victoriae at 10 pairs of each per order, I set out all specimens and kept a few for my personal collection and sold off others at the local shows here in the U.K, because I was buying in bulk I got them much cheaper per unit, those I kept for my collection I basically got them free as I sold off twice as many and the profit I made covered the cost of these, after a show I'd send another order off using the money I made at the show, each order had a few additional species added for my own collection, all paid for by selling off the surplus. Sadly I don't have the time to do the shows much now, I've only attended one in the last 2-3 years as a visitor so my spending has slowed down as I'm not making the hobby pay for itself anymore, I do still buy in bulk though where possible so I have large numbers of surplus should I get the time to do more shows. Just look at the deals you get from insectsale when you buy wholesale, you get 10 specimens for the price of 6, I set them all, keep the best 4 and sell the other 6 for double what I paid, I got 4 specimens free for the collection and covered shipping and import fees and CITES permit costs where applicable. Rich P.S I do like looking through eBay for mixed papered lots going cheap, I bought 900 A1-/A2 Papilio and Nymphalidae from Uganda for 200 euro, there must be 400 Papilio, mostly common mix but I got 2 male P.rex and 11 male and 4 female P.nobilis nominate, 40+ P.mackinnoni and hesperus males, they're worth what I paid for the whole box, when you add the 300+ charaxes and 200 assorted nymphalidae (salamis, euphaedra, hypolimnas etc).
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Dec 27, 2015 0:32:00 GMT -8
I do like the Catocala drawers I have to say, I think we get a couple here in the U.K not sure, I'll have to google it, but I think they are down the south, I would certainly be running a bait trap and light trap if we had all those here.
Rich
|
|
|
Post by beetlehorn on Dec 27, 2015 7:43:10 GMT -8
That's a great way to get some fine specimens for your collection timmsyri. Not to mention efficient and smart, keep some of the best ones and sell the rest to support your hobby/activity. I would do the same, but here in the US you pretty much would have to be a licensed dealer to do that. There are so many regulations imposed upon us including the Lacey act by government agencies that it is a nightmare to try and import anything legally especially cites 2 material as a private collector. So I buy from dealers here in the US, and collect locally and travel to places like Arizona or West Virginia to obtain specimens. It can be a lonely pursuit at times because there are relatively few collectors, and we are spread out far apart. Sadly, it seems that insect collecting is slowly dwindling into oblivion in the US. I feel fortunate to have this website to connect with other collectors worldwide, not to mention the wonderful friendships and comraderie that started here. Where else can you show off your collections, see others collections, and get feedback from hobbyists both amateur and professional, from all over the globe? Last spring Eric and I visited Bill Garthe's home for a few days to celebrate his retirement from teaching. We had a great time, and to personally see his collection was impressive to say the least. The coleoptera he has curated impressed me the most, and the joy of four gathering enthusiasts was uplifting. I collect and study beetles as well, though my collection is thin compared to Bill's. Here are a few of mine.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2015 10:20:43 GMT -8
Yes Tom, that visit was indeed special. I'm down in the insect room and my wife calls down informing me the Internet guy is here.....I grumble and plod upstairs. I turn around the corner and see Brad......then my peripheral vision catches another guy....its Tom. Then I further realize that Eric was there as well. Tom tells me my face was really weird and I'm sure it was. Realize that two of these guys traveled many many miles to surprise me Eric came all the way from eastern TN which is pretty darn far from north central IL and picked up Tom from western TN and the two of them drove up nearly the full length of the state. We had a great time and I really thank all of them and my wife. Apparently it was secretly planned several months before hand and Denise kept the surprise a secret very well. My retirement had many special memories/moments, but seeing my three closest insect buddies was a real treat and I'll always cherish the time we had. Thanks Tom, Eric and Brad..........and Denise too.
|
|