|
|
Post by africaone on May 14, 2011 2:43:34 GMT -8
I can't agree, legs of the male of the pair are spiny on both sides and tarsi elongated ... then serripes (sensu Q & V) !
ps : determination on blistered specimens is highly risky and can't be considered sientifically as reliable !
|
|
|
|
Post by thanos on May 14, 2011 3:45:33 GMT -8
'determination on blistered specimens is highly risky and can't be considered sientifically as reliable !'
- I agree. Maybe the male of the pair(on this male,yes,the spines on the outer also edges of the femurs are indeed visible) ,as well maybe the first female,are serripes. The celofan over these 2 specimens is very shiny and makes it difficult to check well keys like spines.
The last male(it's visible that this male has spines only on the inner edges of the legs) and the female of the pair,the photos of which are more clear,I'm almost sure that are palmata.
Thanos
|
|
