|
|
Post by nomihoudai on Dec 14, 2011 11:43:26 GMT -8
Anybody can see it is a gynandromorph considering that there is two phenotypes expressed and taking into account that these forms belong to the same species, in accordance of a fields leading authority's opinion who based this conclusion probably on more specimen and field experience...
...but you always had problems to reckognize gynandromorphism.
|
|
|
|
Post by simosg on Dec 14, 2011 11:45:59 GMT -8
Clark, can't you open a separate forum section for discussions with Thanos? Would have enough stuff and the other sections would get free of this.  Hannes |
|
|
|
Post by thanos on Dec 14, 2011 12:10:13 GMT -8
'Anybody can see it is a gynandromorph considering that there is two phenotypes expressed and taking into account that these forms belong to the same species'
- No,it's not obvious,it can be also perfectly a male mosaic between the 2 phenotypes. Anyway,anyone can keep his own opinion, and I can contact him to explain me why,if he indeed thinks is a gynandromorph, is sure about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordpandarus on Dec 14, 2011 12:37:02 GMT -8
yeah imagine an Agrias with the full green borders of Agrias beata AND full red forewing
|
|
|
|
Post by lordpandarus on Dec 14, 2011 12:39:00 GMT -8
The most beautiful Agrias I've ever seen is that one someone posted a pic from once Attachments:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2011 12:39:01 GMT -8
I would give $50 for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Dec 15, 2011 2:42:16 GMT -8
Thanks Claude very interesting. This specimen would suggest the "old" amydon classification was right, and that the separation of phalcidon and pericles is false.
If true, a very interesting specimen. Many Agrias collectors (including me) now used M. Spaëth new classification.
|
|
