|
|
Post by kuwagata on Jul 15, 2012 21:01:42 GMT -8
Hi, Need to ID this fresh catches from high mountain,at Kalimantan Island, any help would be appreciated.Here's the list of the pictures thanks for the help |
|
|
|
|
|
Post by lepidofrance on Jul 15, 2012 23:28:15 GMT -8
First point : Kalimantan is very large ! A more acurate location would help ! (subspecies level).
Second point : the photos are not so good !
- number 8 : Idea stolli virgo FRUHSTORFER, 1903.
- 9 : Euthalia lubentina Cramer, 1779
- 13 : probably : Dysphania militaris LINNAEUS, 1758
- 14 :Papilio karna carnatus ROTHSCHILD, 1895 (P. palinurus FABRICIUS, 1787 ?) Photo not so good !!
- 11 : Meandrusa payeni brunei FRUHSTORFER, 1893
- 12 : Delias ninus WALLACE, 1867
- 7 : Probably : Delias cinerascens Mitis 1893
|
|
|
|
Post by kuwagata on Jul 16, 2012 3:17:50 GMT -8
First point : Kalimantan is very large ! A more acurate location would help ! (subspecies level). Second point : the photos are not so good ! - number 8 : Idea stolli virgo FRUHSTORFER, 1903. - 9 : Euthalia lubentina Cramer, 1779 - 13 : probably : Dysphania militaris LINNAEUS, 1758 - 14 : Papilio karna carnatus ROTHSCHILD, 1895 ( P. palinurus FABRICIUS, 1787 ?) Photo not so good !! - 11 : Meandrusa payeni brunei FRUHSTORFER, 1893 - 12 : Delias ninus WALLACE, 1867 - 7 : Probably : Delias cinerascens Mitis 1893 Sorry for bad info.It's West Kalimantan actually, at Sambas Districts, near Sarawak. I don't have a DSLR Camera, and didn't have a good experiences with photograph. As I new in collecting lepidoptera, which I need more guidance especially identification. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Jul 16, 2012 12:47:01 GMT -8
- 14 : Papilio karna carnatus ROTHSCHILD, 1895 ( P. palinurus FABRICIUS, 1787 ?) Photo not so good !! Despite the poor quality photo and specimen, I can confirm that this is Papilio karna carnatusAdam. |
|
|
|
Post by kuwagata on Jul 16, 2012 15:06:29 GMT -8
- 14 : Papilio karna carnatus ROTHSCHILD, 1895 ( P. palinurus FABRICIUS, 1787 ?) Photo not so good !! Despite the poor quality photo and specimen, I can confirm that this is Papilio karna carnatusAdam. Hi Adam, Yes, the photo quality is poor, but the specimen quality is good. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Jul 18, 2012 12:19:21 GMT -8
Hi Adam, Yes, the photo quality is poor, but the specimen quality is good. Not in my book it isn't: scratched hindwing, missing tail, possible damage to the tip of the left forewing I'd treat this as an A2 quality specimen, even if the colour is fresh. Adam. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bichos on Aug 5, 2012 23:20:02 GMT -8
Too right, broken tails are NEVER good. Why bother with leps anyway, when there are so many good beetles in sambas  |
|
|
|
Post by kuwagata on Sept 8, 2012 3:50:26 GMT -8
Hi Adam, Yes, the photo quality is poor, but the specimen quality is good. Not in my book it isn't: scratched hindwing, missing tail, possible damage to the tip of the left forewing I'd treat this as an A2 quality specimen, even if the colour is fresh. Adam. Is it  . Well, it mean I need to learn more from you guys ;D |
|
|
|
Post by kuwagata on Sept 8, 2012 3:52:02 GMT -8
Too right, broken tails are NEVER good. Why bother with leps anyway, when there are so many good beetles in sambas because there's so many leps in here, and so many request about it, well, at least I need to learn it too right ;D |
|
.