|
Post by nomad on Feb 2, 2014 5:01:18 GMT -8
The Dale Parasemia plantaginisIn the Dale collection there is a very fine series of the Wood Tiger [ Parasemia plantaginis]. Some of the specimens have antennae damage, but three of these aberrations are particularly outstanding. Two females have the usual orange tint of the hindwings and body replaced by a deep crimson with which, the costa of the fore-wings are also suffused. One of the male specimens has the white markings, greatly reduced, with the hindwings entirely black and is named Var Matronalis. Other notable aberrations of this species are also shown here with a specimen of subspecies insularum Seitz, which occurs in Shetland, Orkney and northern mainland Scotland. In ssp insularum the hindwings are of a more orange yellow and the black basal markings are more extensive. The splendid black aberration matronalis and bottom, a white var with the hindwing markings missing. Two beautiful ruby aberrations that C.W.Dale bought from Mr Head of Scarborough in 1904. Two specimens of the variety hospita. Yorkshire and the bottom specimen is from Ambleside in the Lake District. Aberration with the hindwing markings missing and bottom, a normal male. The bottom specimen from Orkney is Subspecies insularum Seitz.
|
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 6, 2014 1:48:23 GMT -8
The Blue Stag Beetle [Platycerus caraboides] from the family Lucanidae is found across Europe, but two rather badly set specimens of this species in the Dale collection are of great interest to British Coleopterists, because they are some of the few known examples that have been taken in this country. The relic dead wood specialist P. caraboides was last captured in Britain during the middle part of the 19th century. It has always been very rare here, with a few scattered records from : Bristol, Windsor Great Forest, near Oxford ,the West Country and Scotland. The wealthy Reverend F.W. Hope, who founded the entomological collections at Oxford was mainly interested in Coleoptera. In 1822 when Hope was an undergraduate at Christ Church university in Oxford he took a specimen of P. caraboides at nearby Wytham woods and this specimen is one of those in the Dale collection. The other sadly lacks any data. The two Dale specimens of Platycerus caraboides The F.W. Hope specimen has the data right.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 6, 2014 7:12:57 GMT -8
Dale's SwallowtailsThe Dale series of 21 specimens of Papilio machaon is of great historical interest. Not only does the collection contain specimens from the long extinct population at Whittlesea mere, that researches can compare to those extant populations in the Norfolk broads, it contains several genuine British specimens of subspecies gorganus. A number of specimens of subspecies brittannicus were caught by J.C Dale and his friend B. Standish between 1819-1821 at Whittlesea mere in Huntingdonshire, where it used to occur in great plenty. The Swallowtail became extinct at Whittlesea in 1851, when the great mere and fen were drained. There is also a specimen of brittannicus with the label- Bardolph Fen ,caterpillar Norfolk June 1820 [ J.C.Dale] turned to butterfly July 4 1820. Other 19th century specimens of brittannicus are from Wicken Fen in Cambridgeshire, the last known locality outside of the Norfolk Broads. It was last seen at Wicken in 1952. There are also a number of specimens of subspecies gorganus collected by J.C. Dale in his parish of Glanville's Wootton in Dorsetshire. Dale recorded gorganus at Glanville's Wootton every year between 1808-1816. The last specimen of gorganus from Glanville's Wootton was taken by J.C.Dale in August 1815 at Newland's common , although he saw another visiting a thistle there in 1816. It is known from the records that subspecies gorganus was able to temporary establish itself in a number of places in southern England during the 19th century. There is also a specimen of gorganus in the Dale collection from Dover. There is the curious case of George Austin writing in 1856 who recalls he was accustomed to finding the larvae of P. machaon in the Osier Beds behind Battersea Fields in South London, but he never saw the adults. Because of the habitat it is thought Austin was referring to brittannicus, but more likely the larvae that he obtained may have belonged to subspecies gorganus. P. machaon brittannicus collected by J.C Dale on August 7th 1820 at Whittlesea mere in Huntingdonshire. P. machaon brittannicus aberrant. P. machaon gorganus female, the last ever specimen of this subspecies that Dale took on August 17th, 1815 at Glanville's Wootton.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 6, 2014 22:04:08 GMT -8
It is quite interesting that British machaon occurs in fens (or wet places in general??) as I find this butterfly one of the most unassuming species-it can be found everywhere no matter on altitude or biotop. There are a number of factors. which make britannicus a good subspecies. Its Fenland habitat, only feeding on Milk-Parsley and besides from the Dale specimens above you can clearly see there are differences. In Europe gorganus roams freely throughout the countryside and feeds on a wide range of Umbellifers . We have had this before, but it is interesting although gorganus will visit us as an immigrant, it seems to have never established itself permanently.
|
|
|
Post by bobw on Feb 7, 2014 0:55:24 GMT -8
I do not think that gorganus feeds on many plants at one place. There are stated so many plants because it occures a huge number of different habitats but in a certain place it prefers a certain plant. We have gorganus in our garden where we have various plants-carrots, parsley...When we had there also cumin, larvae were only on this one and when we did not have it, I found larvae only on parsley. I do not think that a foodplant is a proper distinguishing character as a species prefers different plants on different habitats. Regarding the brittanicus. Its main (not only!) foodplant is Milk-Parsley, it means that it feeds primary on this one but can feed on many others. Brittanicus is a fennland butterfly and Milk-Parsley is common in fens so it is logic that it primary feeds on this plant. You're probably right that foodplant is not a distinguishing character in subspeciation; I've reared britannicus on several other Umbellifers in captivity, it will also reluctantly take some Rutacae. I've also found ova of gorganus on both Ferula and Foeniculum at the same site. I think the habitat preference as well as the very different habitus is enough to distinguish britannicus as a good subspecies. In the right habitat it can be very common; the opportunity is there for it to spread into other habitats but it has never taken it. Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2014 1:25:45 GMT -8
Fantastic piece Peter, the Dale photo's are superb, thanks for sharing them. One thing that has always amazed me about this hobby, and still does, is how fresh specimens look when kept properly even after 200 years plus, I have specimens in my collection that almost date to this period of time and I am astounded at times that they look as good as the ones I caught last year, it's such a shame that so many historical specimens in some museums are lost to dermestids because of neglect. My British Cyaniris semiargus being a case in point, 160 years old and still fresh as a daisy.
As for papilio machaon Britannicus is concerned it may be restricted to the Norfolk Broads now but we know from historical literature that this was not always the case, it was once very widespread in England before the dramatic change in land use, it stands to reason that it would still be widespread if the land reverted back to what it used to be(it wont) but a reintroduction to other areas would be possible if the reserve were of sufficient size.
|
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 7, 2014 11:57:38 GMT -8
I am pleased that you enjoyed the piece dunc. Yes, it is wonderful the specimens that were caught so many years ago still look quite fresh today. This is because, the Dale collection has received the proper attention it deserves. I believe today they now freeze the drawers regularly. It is true that our P. machaon subspecies britannicus was widespread across the East Anglian Fens. Perhaps it also once occurred in the Somerset levels and along the Thames marshes? Other southern England populations that occurred in different habitats should be attributed to subspecies gorganus. Many lepidoptera will take other foodplants in captivity rather than starve, however in the wild the larvae of subspecies britannicus are nearly always found on Milk Parsley. I believe that in captivity, what the British Swallowtail larvae may feed on, when their foodplant of choice is not available, does relate to subspecies britannicus very long association with Milk Parsley in its fenland habitat. Subspecies brittannicus never utilizes other widespread Umbellifers, otherwise it would be found in a range of habitats, just like the continental gorganus. Furthermore, there are clear morphological differences. The British britannicus have more extensive darker markings than gorganus. For the full differences, see E.B. Ford - Butterflies [ 1945] page 302. Although the British Swallowtail from different fenland localities may have been all similar, those historical specimens build a good picture of where the Swallowtail occurred and how widespread it once was. Attempts to reintroduce this butterfly to Wicken Fen have failed, the water table is now too low and the habitat has changed. Perhaps they will try to introduce this lovely butterfly to the Somerset levels where I believe the foodplant still occurs. I have heard talk of this.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 8, 2014 0:25:29 GMT -8
If the British Swallowtail, subspecies britannicus ever occurred in the once vast marshes of the Somerset Levels in the West Country of England, it must have been a very very long time ago. I can find no published accounts of it ever being captured in that locality and there does not seem to any historical specimens. None of the great 19th century entomologists seem to mention this locality in their books, so if you know where the idea came from that subspecies britannicus once occurred in these Somerset marshes, please let me know. Peter.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 8, 2014 4:20:43 GMT -8
A fine variety of Melanargia galatheaThe Marbled White [ Melanargia galathea ] is easily the most striking of the British satyrids. In the Dale collection there is an outstanding dark aberration from the early 19th century, that is labelled Mr Le Plastrier Dover. It seems that Mr Plastrier was a very lucky collector [ see the A. aglaja post ]. This fine variety was figured in the London Magazine of Natural History with detailed drawings by the Reverend William T. Bree in 1832. Later, the Reverend F.O Morris, a good friend of J.C. Dale, pictured the Le Plastrier Melanargia galathea specimen on a fine plate in his, A History of British Butterflies that was published in 1853. It can be seen from both the Bree and the Morris figures that this fine aberration also has a very different verso side. William Bree was the Rector of Polebrook in Northamptonshire and was well known to British Entomologists by his interesting accounts of the Large Blue [ M. arion ] that he discovered at Barnwell Wold during the 1830's. In the Dale collection there is also a specimen of M. galathea with a buff ground colour, which has the data J.G. Ross 1879, another collector who had phenomenal luck in the field. Below the Ross specimen is an aberration with broad black margins and much reduced hindwing white-markings. Peter. Dale's fine var. The historic early 19th century Le Plastrier Dover specimen. The William T. Bree figure of the Le Plastrier specimen. The London Magazine of Natural History - 1832. A colour plate showing the Le Plastrier M.galathea specimen. From A History of British Butterflies by F.O Morris - 1853. Two other aberrations of M. galathea in the Dale collection. The top specimen was taken by J.G. Ross in 1879.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 9, 2014 9:05:25 GMT -8
The Dale specimens of Colias are of interest, because they are probably some of the best and oldest British examples in historical collections. There are also some interesting Colias colour forms, aberrations and some unusual miniatures. The collection might contain three or two Colias species. None of these species are resident U.K butterflies, being unable to survive our cold winters. The Clouded Yellow [ Colias croceus] usually graces our shores in most summers, when the early arrivals will breed, with further generations later in the summer. Not every year is a good year for C. croceus in the U.K, 2012 was very poor, but 2013 was much better. I mentioned that there may be two or three species in the Dale collection, because in the series of Pale Clouded Yellow [ C. hyale ] there could be a specimen or two of Berger's Clouded Yellow [ C. alfacariensis]? Both the latter species also have bred in Britain, but they are today much scarcer visitors to these islands. Not being an expert in Colias and because, both C. hyale and C. alfacariensis are very difficult to distinguish, perhaps Bob or others here would like to comment on the Dale specimens and perhaps the presence of C. alfacariensis in the Dale collection. Many of these specimens were collected by James Dale himself. Peter. C. croceus specimens. Left. miniatures with a normal size specimen above. Right. Lovely female lemon varieties. C. croceus specimens left, with a female showing a smaller hindwing. Middle. C. croceus female Lemon varieties. Right. A series of C. hyale with perhaps specimens of C. alfacariensis, middle-top??? C. croceus specimens. Left. The female at bottom, is a nice large example that is missing most of the black hindwing margins. Right. female specimens of form helice. C. croceus female form helice left and right C. hyale females?? C. croceus specimens. Left. miniatures and right female forms. A nice series of C. croceus specimens. Two versos of C. hyale??
|
|
|
Post by bobw on Feb 10, 2014 7:30:16 GMT -8
Peter
Obviously when Dale's collection was formed nobody was aware that there were two different species of "pale clouded yellow". It's not too difficult to identify them when you get your eye in but it takes a while. When I was sorting out the 500+ specimens in my collection I quickly was able to separate them with 99% accuracy; just looking at these photos having not really studied them for a few years it's a little more difficult. However I would say that top two males in your 2nd photo are C. alfacariensis but the one below them is hyale; all the specimens in photo 4 seem to be hyale.
I've looked at quite a lot of "British" hyale and in my experience about 75% are alfacariensis. This makes sense when you look at their distribution on the near continent.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2014 10:38:55 GMT -8
I have quite a few genuine British specimens of each species and find it very difficult to tell them apart.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 10, 2014 12:32:04 GMT -8
Thanks Bob for the ID. I thought those two might be C. alfacariensis. I have corrected the latin name for the Clouded Yellow = C croceus. It is amazing that no one recognized until 1945, that there was another species of Colias in Europe and that it had been collected in Britain long ago in the early 19th Century. The Belgian entomologist who discovered this, L.A Berger must have been very pleased. James Dale would have been most surprised. Looking again at the Dale specimens, I am amazed at their condition, especially as some of them are nearly two hundred years old! Below are two of my images of two different female C croceus that I managed to photograph on the Wiltshire U.K. Downs, August 2013 . C. croceus female feeding at Wild Basil [ Clinopodium vulgare]. C. croceus female resting on Woolly-headed Thistle [ Cirsium eriophorum] during dark cloud followed by rain. Well camouflaged.
|
|
|
Post by bobw on Feb 10, 2014 23:28:58 GMT -8
I think the only 100% method how to distinguish these 2 species is to breed them, otherwise there will be always doubts. Both species are variable and the other thing is that they prefer different habitats. Sure, the only way to be 100% sure is to breed them, but that doesn't help to identify specimens in collections. Yes, they do prefer different habitats and hyale is on average found at higher altitudes than alfacariensis; they are very rarely found flying together. The range is also different: alfacariensis is strictly European whareas hyale is found as far east as Yakutia, and is rarer in the far west of Europe. Also, although both species are noted wanderers, reaching places like the UK on occasion, they are not migratory in the sense that C. ctoceus is; most of the time they're fairly sedentary. There are a few diagnostic features and a combination of these gives you a pretty good idea. I've examined several thousand specimens for the book in my own collection, BMNH and many other private collections, including many where the species was known (but not by me until I'd attempted ID). I reckon I can confidently determine 90%+ of males and 70-80% of females. Bob
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Feb 10, 2014 23:53:40 GMT -8
It is amazing that no one recognized until 1945, that there was another species of Colias in Europe and that it had been collected in Britain long ago in the early 19th Century. The Belgian entomologist who discovered this, L.A Berger must have been very pleased. Well, it was described already in 1905 by Ribbbe... Well the name that Berger used, D. alfacariensis had been used by Ribbe in 1905 for a form of Pale Clouded Yellow, C. hyale, which may have been this species. So I am afraid Colias alfacariensis Berger 1948 stands. Ribbe thought he was naming a form of C. hyale, Berger knew he was naming a new species. There was some controversy over the use of the name alfacariensis and so in 1950, Berger and Hemming tried to rename the butterfly australis . australis was again invalid, because Verity had already given that name to a subspecific form C. hyale. Cockanye in 1952 objected to both the names alfacariensis and australis and named Berger's new species, Colias calida in 1952. As all these different names were being used by different entomologists, in 1982 some order was restored and, under the established rules of nomenclatural priority, alfacariensis was readmitted. O, to be a taxonomist . . Information taken from The Aurelian Legacy by Michael A. Salmon.
|
|