Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 12:17:42 GMT -8
 just took these beauties off the boards, well pleased. |
|
|
|
jaume
Full Member
Posts: 210
|
Post by jaume on Aug 26, 2014 8:34:31 GMT -8
I don't collect this group, but I must say they are wonderful. Congratulations Dunc
JAUME
|
|
|
|
Post by daveuk on Sept 28, 2014 7:18:06 GMT -8
Hi Dunc You have probably seen these elsewhere but these are my S godfreyi. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2014 23:29:15 GMT -8
could look at them all day Dave.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordpandarus on Sept 29, 2014 19:34:14 GMT -8
it's hard to tell by the photos, but is the male more intense color than the female?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2014 23:02:59 GMT -8
female is slightly darker on mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Sept 30, 2014 5:56:05 GMT -8
Splendid species !
Steeve had some nice examples of different sp / ssp for sale at Juvisy. It was an impressive drawer !
|
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Feb 14, 2015 12:46:55 GMT -8
Dave, what's the data on your godfreyi specimens cos those on the left are quite a bit larger than those on the right.
Bottom picture, top left is female but can't tell with the bottom left if it's male or female, s.sp pinratana is quite a bit larger than the nominate.
Rich
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Feb 15, 2015 9:39:01 GMT -8
The name Stichophthalma godfreyi pinratanai Ek-Amnuay, [2007] is a nomen nudum because no type specimens were designated in the original description. The subspecies from Ranong, S Thailand, does not currently have a valid name.
I told Ek-Amnuay that his names were unavailable after his book was published, and he tried to rectify the problem in the 2nd edition by listing holotypes there. However the names are all still unavailable because he didn't treat them as new taxa in the 2nd edition as required by the Code. He just listed types in 2012, treating the names as published in 2006 (actually 2007, as the book was not published until then).
Adam.
|
|
|
|
Post by timmsyrj on Feb 16, 2015 0:59:04 GMT -8
Thanks for that info Adam, not bad for someone who doesn't know much about stichophthalma, so for now we have the nominate and an un named possible s.sp or just a big form from Ranong, this must fly with louisa s.sp ranohngensis so hopefully I can find a supplier for both in one hit, which would be good.
Rich
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Feb 17, 2015 8:22:59 GMT -8
There were also new names introduced in Papilionidae and other families in that book. The only one that was validly published is apparently a junior synonym, as the same taxon had been described by a Japanese a few months previously.
Adam.
|
|
