|
Post by wollastoni on Oct 25, 2014 5:15:38 GMT -8
Thanks.
It confirms what I thought. Some people here behind their computer are very fast to condemn their fellow entomologists... very sad.
|
|
|
|
Post by alandmor on Oct 25, 2014 7:07:39 GMT -8
Another version of the event from Thomas Ihle's Facebook page:
Our statement - To whom it may concern
We are not quide stupid. We know well that collecting of animals at National Parks in Thailand as well as all over the world is forbidden. We wanted visit a northernmost part of Thailand because the fauna of the Lepidoptera of this part of the country is pure known and we would like to collect a further data for revised edition of volume 6 of Moths of Thailand (Arctiidae) whose author was one of us. The asphalt road going to this area is searched by military troops because road is a border-line between Thailand and Myanmar. Along the road and its vicinity are no information that we are in National Park. At the entry to the forest stays a check-point with armed soldiers. They controlled personal documents of our driver and desired data wrote into the service book. They asked us on the purpose of our visit. We explain we will collect butterflies there and demonstrated that by collecting moths resting at the construction of the check-point. The security guard gave us a permission to enter border area without any limitations. Later in the afternoon when we found the proper place and we started construct the tents visited us 4 persons with car. They did not introduce themselves, asked whether we shall overnight on this place, warn us before criminal elements penetrating from Myanmar, warn us before ticks (Ixodes sp.) and gave us some fruits. During their visit one of us hold a butterfly net in hands. During the night the same staff, together with soldiers returned to our camp. What follows is described in the official statement. The journalists were informed by the direction of the National park. We were in the same room but we did not got the possibility to give any comment.
Dr. Karel Cerny Dr. Zdenek Weidenhoffer Dipl.Ing. Bohumil Vodrlind Thomas Ihle
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Oct 27, 2014 10:11:26 GMT -8
Welcome to foreign countries!
I won't call Thailand third-world, but this type of problem is rampant. If one doesn't accidentally get into the wrong area, corruption, boredom, jealously, etc can land a collector in the same position. Who that travels hasn't been through a shake-down by police?
And it isn't just developing countries. A couple years ago two German tourists were arrested while arriving into NYC because they had automatic knives ("switchblades"). While being totally legal in Germany (and in most areas of USA) they aren't legal for import into NY. The Germans were perplexed, offering that they had no clue that pocket knives could be illegal in a country awash with firearms. That one would think this way is defensible. But instead of being freed of their knives they made it on CNN. Welcome to USA!
Whether home or overseas, I am more watchful of the police than criminal elements.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Oct 27, 2014 10:53:50 GMT -8
Welcome to foreign countries! I won't call Thailand third-world, but this type of problem is rampant. If one doesn't accidentally get into the wrong area, corruption, boredom, jealously, etc can land a collector in the same position. Who that travels hasn't been through a shake-down by police? And it isn't just developing countries. A couple years ago two German tourists were arrested while arriving into NYC because they had automatic knives ("switchblades"). While being totally legal in Germany (and in most areas of USA) they aren't legal for import into NY. The Germans were perplexed, offering that they had no clue that pocket knives could be illegal in a country awash with firearms. That one would think this way is defensible. But instead of being freed of their knives they made it on CNN. Welcome to USA! Whether home or overseas, I am more watchful of the police than criminal elements. Why in the hell would anyone want to carry flick knives anyway.
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Oct 28, 2014 8:53:58 GMT -8
Why in the hell would anyone want to carry flick knives anyway. Ah yes, you are from the land where one must be of age and/or licensed to purchase tableware. I suppose armchair "travelers" may never need one. But beyond convenience, the ability to open with one hand and/or open quickly can make the difference between life and death.
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Oct 28, 2014 10:21:59 GMT -8
Why in the hell would anyone want to carry flick knives anyway. Ah yes, you are from the land where one must be of age and/or licensed to purchase tableware. I suppose armchair "travelers" may never need one. But beyond convenience, the ability to open with one hand and/or open quickly can make the difference between life and death. You were taking about New York not some remote Jungle. If you think the U.K is a really safe place, especially in the inner cities, think again.
|
|
|
|
Post by nomad on Oct 28, 2014 10:51:14 GMT -8
P.S. I have in fact traveled to many counties including the U.S.A and have never needed to carry a knife.
|
|
|
Post by papapapillon on Nov 17, 2014 3:28:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Nov 17, 2014 6:02:33 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by papapapillon on Nov 17, 2014 12:50:08 GMT -8
Wher I fully agree with Karel Cerny: the note about light pollution in Thailand (and elsewhere). Here the picture of a lamp at the checkpoint of a Thai Naturalpark. Every night there are some hundred (or thousand) moths killed - at every lamp.
|
|
|
Post by lepidofrance on Nov 17, 2014 14:26:26 GMT -8
Here again the big question of collecting permits (and export) in protected areas (or for some countries, on the whole territory). As for me, I most often provided with operating license in accordance with local legislation. Especially, of course, for these protected areas. However, the question as a whole, is not just to know what is legal or not. It is possible that in some European countries, such as Slovakia, things are rational or idyllic (National Parks being effectively safeguarded and respected by all), it goes very differently in the Tropics! In most of these tropical countries (Asia, Africa, the Neotropics), National Parks are often (and hypocritically) to give a clear conscience to the bureaucratic coalition of politicians (more or less corrupted) and environmentalists (most often ignorant entomological realities). It prohibits the collect of insects (and offenders, especially foreigners, are sent to prison). At the same time, deforestation continues briskly (in the protected area!), Loggers cut down rare and precious trees (and other species sought for access), poachers act, and local collectors kill huge amount of insects. The most typical case is that of Brazil where every collecting is prohibited, but where the airport shops are filled with butterflies for sale, souvenirs made of butterfly wings, and so on. Of course, these said local poiticiens (including police) receive their "envelope" from the loggers, collectors, destroyers of forests! In many of these countries (and I think Thailand is a good example), nowadays the situation boils down to this: one side, Parks where collect is prohibited, on the other, the anthropic areas cultivated, where you will find only ubiquitous and common species. Of course, having the authorization, we may collect in the park, after months or years of bureaucratic procedures for obtaining that license !! We can not be satisfied with a smug and naive compliance with laws call, knowing that these laws are often violated by those on site are responsible for environmental protection. Finally, and this is an important (and often overlooked by those who discuss this) point you can not put on the same level protection of rhinos and tigers that of insects. On the one hand, a few hundreds (or even just a few tens of individuals remaining life), the other of millions. Collecting butterflies in a rainforest, we will be glad to catch a few along one of the few paths for entering the forest when millions others remain completely inaccessible! At the risk of repeating myself, nowadays, in most tropical countries (the situation is different in the Palaearctic area), protected areas are more or less like the alibi of politicians who, every day, approve, otherwise encourage, massive deforestation. Here are some legal (totally legal !!) collect authorizations :
|
|
|
Post by lepidofrance on Nov 17, 2014 15:29:24 GMT -8
An example for those who believe in the tropics, it goes the same way as in the idyllic Slovakia. This example is the Park Kinabatangan River in Sabah (Malaysian Borneo). First let me say that I stayed there provided with all the necessary authorizations (collect and export). Before arriving on the Kinabantagan, between Mount Kinabalu and the river, you have to drive crossing nearly 300 km of oil palm plantations (rainforest completely destroyed: distressing): Photo # 1. Photo 2 shows the affixed panel along the river bank (Pangi area) explaining all bans for this protected area. Photo 3 shows the boundary between the primary forest and oil palm plantation. On the one hand (palm oil), fly some Satyrinae and Hypolimnas bolina, on the other, dozens of interesting species ... Finally, the photo 4 (from Google Earth) shows the extreme narrowness of the protected area: a few miles at best, at worst tens of meters, for elephants, apes (orangutans), insects! Needless to say, any collector of insects will be strongly tempted (with or without permission) to leave the area of palm oil to enter the restricted area ... Habitat destruction nevertheless benefit some species: rats multiplied (they eat beans palms) causing multiplication of cobras snakes (they feed on rats) ... Hence frequent bites for plantation workers (usually immigrants more or less illegal from Indonesia). Nothing in common with what is found in the Palearctic region. Take a French example: of course, it is completely forbidden to collect plants or insects in the Mercantour National Park (Southern Alps). That said, around, you will find many beautiful forests and meadows where butterflies fly, the same species (including Parnassinae in large numbers) than in the Mercantour. Nothing to do with this dichotomy that characterizes many tropical countries, this dichotomy remaining forests (protected areas) and almost totally anthropic areas. These are realities to consider before scandalized the lawlessness!
|
|
|
Post by lepidofrance on Nov 17, 2014 16:12:35 GMT -8
Another point is noteworthy. Scientists and amateurs "only concerned with enriching their personal collection" are opposed. Assuming that the first easily have collecting permissions when others do not deserve. They forget (it must be remembered in this entomological forum?) that entomology is largely developed through the contributions of amateurs "concerned about their personal collection!" These amateurs do not have, more often, the opportunity to enjoy the institutional support to enable them to make representations to the environmental authorities in tropical countries. I do not know what is in the idyllic Slovakia. For cons, I know that in France the state finance a handful of scientists. And I presume it is the same for most countries. Without the contribution of amateurs, financing their own travel, many species will become extinct before they have been described. Call for strict compliance with regulations (even the outliers), in this era of massive habitat destruction, is to paralyze the entomological science.
|
|
|
Post by compsulyx on Nov 17, 2014 19:28:49 GMT -8
My god, what a disaster....the end of rainforest in a few years...this is really depressing.... Just to come back on light pollution, here in New Caledonian, our association of Entomology has participated a few time ago to a project to raise awareness of the mining sites which exploit the nickel, in order to decrease their light pollution when they are working at night. Before they were using big mercury vapor lamps, sometimes many 1000 watts units were joined together to work on some sites...Thousands of insects were sacrified during the hot season particularly, as well as migratory birds such as petrels, which are also attracted by the white light. The mining machinery goosed on the track and on insects, birds, without any interest....It was a real disaster .... We then carried out a poster to raise awareness, with our findings and proposals, to all officials (politics too), including the directions of the mining groups of course .... I think it was necessary to put their nose in poop in order to get a reaction....and the results were good as most of mines changed their mercury vapor lamps with some sodium ones, less attractive, and they reviewed their needs in terms of power, etc...a big improvement !...Insects and birds : 1 - Mines : 0 !!!... I will try to find out this poster and send it to you later. Thierry
|
|
|
Post by compsulyx on Nov 18, 2014 0:06:43 GMT -8
|
|