|
Post by lucanidae25 on Apr 19, 2011 15:11:07 GMT -8
Be very careful with these eds: www.eurofauna.com/invertebrates/dried-insectsJingke Li is back to his old trick again by using the materials that he gets from Laos, China and fakeing datas from Myanmar and Buthan in order to sell them.
|
|
|
|
Post by saturniidave on Apr 19, 2011 16:31:46 GMT -8
And he has learned to speak Czech too!
|
|
|
Post by thanos on Apr 20, 2011 19:42:46 GMT -8
I have just received another email from Jingke (carabuslaos@yahoo.com.cn),with topic 'New Wholesale Beetles and Lepidoptera,parnassius specimens' ,from 'laos office' ,offering many different mixed lots with datas..,also a list of Carabidae and Lucanidae,and a book : 'By Li Jingke,2005,<The Carabinae of China,>' ....
Is he a swindler ? I've never dealt with him or replied to his emails.
Thanos
|
|
|
Post by downundermoths on Apr 20, 2011 21:36:53 GMT -8
I hadn't realised that he had become inactive... judging by the emails that frequently arrive...
|
|
|
Post by bichos on Apr 20, 2011 23:34:01 GMT -8
I have just received another email from Jingke (carabuslaos@yahoo.com.cn),with topic 'New Wholesale Beetles and Lepidoptera,parnassius specimens' ,from 'laos office' ,offering many different mixed lots with datas..,also a list of Carabidae and Lucanidae,and a book : 'By Li Jingke,2005,<The Carabinae of China,>' .... Is he a swindler ? I've never dealt with him or replied to his emails. Thanos Yeah! he has not deactivated his activities at all judjing by the e-mails no. Not a swindler as such but rather a dealer , packing is rudementary. and he has been the source of unreliable data, he does deliver however and it is very tempting his forte would be carabidae from what I understand...
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Apr 21, 2011 7:46:19 GMT -8
Unreliable data is a total understatement!!! He deliberately fakes data in order to sell cheap specimens for higher than normal prices. Try doing a search for Li Jingke in the old forum, and you'll find some examples there.
Just for an example he was selling $5 Papilio krishna charlesi (from Sichuan) for $30 each with data "Pongsaly, N. Laos". He also sold Sichuan P. bootes ($3 each in Sichuan, maybe) with the same data for $20 each. I have examined specimens and not only are they clearly from Sichuan, but the bootes were specifically selected (white spotted form only, black form would be too obvious to most collectors).
I know of many other similar fake specimens, and to be blunt, his actions are fraudulent and in any other business they would be acted upon by the police. Sadly in future such specimens with fake data will end up in museums, and researchers will not realise the data is fake.
Adam.
|
|
|
|
Post by thanos on Apr 21, 2011 11:38:28 GMT -8
Thank you Adam for this info. 'Sadly in future such specimens with fake data will end up in museums, and researchers will not realise the data is fake.' -This would be really bad..
Thanos
|
|
|
Post by wollastoni on Apr 26, 2011 1:43:39 GMT -8
A serious seller in China with accurate data would earn a lot of money... too bad, no Chinese man has understood it for the moment.
Another example, Delias lattivita formasana lives only in Taiwan. It is offered from Sichuan by a Chinese seller on Ebay. I kindly inform him his identification was false and that he may receive complaints from potential bidders.
--> He answered me he was 100% sure formosana fly in Sichuan ...
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Apr 26, 2011 6:32:44 GMT -8
The problem with Chinese dealers' identification of the butterflies they are selling is that they only believe the often erroneous Chinese literature. It doesn't matter how many times you tell them something they'll just carry on believing the books they read.
Adam.
|
|
|
Post by timoinsects on Apr 27, 2011 11:56:51 GMT -8
the insects of china in international market mostly and originally were from native dealers,they got little points about the importance of accurate collecting data,as they collect as many as possible in bulks, so what they care more is how to come more money by the several "good species",for other insects ,some of which were putted together and sold as "mixed",so this is one of the problems. mixed a lot insects can never have a same data.
here a few chinese DO have the correct and accurate data as the hunted themself and they are not into commercial issues. and don't like to collect exotic insects.in stead they collect mainly china's domestic species. i know a man,the boss of a company he paied to his friends and gave them a jeep for helping him to collect domestic lucanidae of china. so his men went to different prov. of china and collected many good uncommon species. and some he donated to the china scientific agencys that rearch insects. he doesn't even buy from the native dealers as he told me before ONLY COLLECT the insects with 100% correct data. and this must be guaranteed.
many species/genus can not be identifiated easily for the hobbiests or dealers as the lack of books this is different from Japan ,Europe that many books for hobbiests available for ID. that's a problem,for the most basic ID,just in a need of the latin name is difficult.
and,other data like collecting date,places,and altitudes,the 3rd one is impossible for the native dealers,don't expected they will take a altitude watch when making collecting in wild.
Adam"they'll just carry on beliving the books they read",anything wrong in books? for the unknewn species only from websites or books,for ID the most basic element "latin name". if not from books so from where???and for the rest data(places,date of collecting) should base on where or whom they obtained the specimens from. the second one don't need to rely on books. and this is the possibility coming out fake data.
|
|
|
Post by Adam Cotton on Apr 29, 2011 10:46:28 GMT -8
Timo,
There is nothing wrong with books in general.
The problem with the Chinese books that the dealers use is that many of the names are wrong, so the dealers just repeat these incorrect names, believing they must be right because they are in the Monographia Rhopalocerorum Sinensium (Chou et al. 1994), and other local works. The basic problem with these books is that the authors didn't check the old literature or overseas museum collections when writing them, and many Chinese scientists named lots of 'new' taxa that are just synonyms as a result.
They also gave us such fantastic names as Lamproptera curia and Pazala euroa (for curius and eurous respectively), not realising that the specific names do not decline. You will find that the dealers all follow these incorrect spellings.
Another good example is the misidentification of 'Paranticopsis' macareus and xenocles in Gu & Cheng 1997, Butterflies in Hainan Island. The result is that at least one Chinese eBay seller swaps the 2 species names for the specimens they sell, because they rely solely on that book to identify the specimens they sell; so if you buy macareus you will actually receive xenocles and vice-versa.
Adam.
|
|