|
Post by bluemoth on Sept 2, 2016 16:13:51 GMT -8
I am not righting this thread to get ridiculed or razed about the subject matter. So if you want to make negative comments go start your own thread.
Progect go and see was started by Reo who has found and learned some amazing things about Bigfoots. See his videos under heading Utah Sasquatch on you tube. He has two videos specificly to help you find evidence of this creature your self. The first is how to find big foot in one day. Truly amazing - he choses a canyon to check out that he has never been to. Shure anuff there is the evidence of bigfoot in the forest at the end of the canyon. The other video is more about picking the right spot to look - a study of the land scape and all its parts are considered in this video. I have learned do not pick a popular city park or state park - to many people there that like to make the same stick structures that bigfoots do. How ever some of the stick structures I saw looked very old. So I will choose a more remote park. I have been to the park I have in mind once - it has the water and thick woods Bigfoots like. One day I hope to get to the sierras about a 4 hour drive from my home. There I can catch insects and look for evidence of Bigfoot at the same time in very remote areas. I was once a skeptic but after seeing so many of the same things in so many videos by different people now I must say I am starting to believe that a large ape like hominid hides in remote wooded areas of the US and Canada. They are reclusive but cureus about us and some people have had close encounters with them because of this. Bigfoots aperently must travel to other places some times so folks see them crossing roads. So take on Reo's challenge and go find a bigfoot or at least it's stick structures and may be a foot print or two if you are really lucky. Use the best caulity camera gear you can afford and keep still do not run if you see a bigfoot - just keep on filming. It will probly be more afraid of you than you are of it. Then post it on youtube with Reo's hash tag progect go and see.
Big thanks to Reo for encuriging me !! Also thanks to Rocky Mountain Sasquatch Orginisation ( your video searches for Bigfoot are ausum ), Colorado Bigfoot (amazing wood structure finds )and Thinkerthuncker for analising some amazing vides of bigfoot.
|
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Sept 7, 2016 8:48:58 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by bluemoth on Sept 7, 2016 10:53:13 GMT -8
Well that's a bit of a scary encounter that person had. Folks are having encounters all the time. I believe many are not reported. Some bigfoots have been video taped and carefully analyzed by Thinkerthunck on YouTube. Most of the time as I watch researcher night videos wood knocks, branch braking and sometimes a scream like yell is all they get. Very aggressive behavior is rare like a bluff charge for example. Day time videos of habitation areas I have watched may include objects being throne in the researchers direction. Often no bigfoots on seen and all is quiet on most day time videos of habitation sites that I have seen. Some researchers leave sound recorders at habitation sites and have recorded knocks and big trees being pushed down. So far catching a bigfoot on game came has been troubling for researchers but I think some body is going to get lucky one of these days. It is believed that bigfoots can hear the normally inaudible sound of a camorra turning on like deer can. This may be scaring them away from game cams. It is a new sound in the woods they do not normally hear. But I think if the cams are left in the same spot for very long time (years) the sounds may just become like some thing normal like all the bird songs they hear every day. That is when I think some one will get a picture.
|
|
|
Post by bluemoth on Sept 7, 2016 12:11:37 GMT -8
Just found a little tid bit for all you non believers out there - The Texas Bigfoot Research Conservancy has an article about a DNA study of two bigfoot samples. Go Reed It!! Truly shocking!!
|
|
leptraps
Banned
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,397
|
Post by leptraps on Sept 7, 2016 13:31:07 GMT -8
With all the guns in this country and all of those who are out there. Somebody would have shot one by now.
I wonder who "They" will vote for.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2016 13:35:25 GMT -8
Why haven't we found a dead one?
|
|
|
|
Post by bluemoth on Sept 7, 2016 14:58:44 GMT -8
How often have you found a dead animal or bird in the woods? I am guessing it is pretty rare. I go walking in the woods and its very rare to find a dead thing of any kind. Natural predators and decomposition will get rid of any evidence very quickly. But the DNA evidence the TBRC has should put the "we need a body" thing to rest. Very fascinating - read it!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2016 15:43:51 GMT -8
I agree that nature's garbage disposal teams are very quick to get rid of physical remains. I have found plenty of dead animals over the years. I once saw 18-20 vultures fighting over a dead box turtle. I had to scratch my head at that one. The fact is we do need a body or at the very least a skeleton. My point is that too many people have claimed to see these things for there not to be something out there. The mystery to me is why we haven't found any remains.
|
|
leptraps
Banned
Enter your message here...
Posts: 2,397
|
Post by leptraps on Sept 7, 2016 16:41:24 GMT -8
We have found remains and she is running for President.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2016 16:50:37 GMT -8
Just when I thought I was bad. You show up and in a one liner remind me of why you are my personal hero!
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Sept 8, 2016 6:31:51 GMT -8
With all the guns in this country and all of those who are out there. Somebody would have shot one by now. I wonder who "They" will vote for. It is odd that nobody has produced one, if they exist. However, the gorilla wasn't described by European scientists until 1857. And there's the Coelecanth, and on and on. One would have to think Yeti are more intelligent and difficult to find than gorillas. But that's why I posted that link- a "confirmed" attack! Stop screwing around with cameras and busted trees. This isn't like trying to figure out where one might be, or hoping to cross paths, or even trying to find out where to catch the Bog Buckbean Moth. You have the location, it's for rent, and if it's truly full of sasquatch that come right to you it should be a no-brainer! Just go rent the cabin, bring your heavy caliber firearms with NVG, and get one! Chuck
|
|
|
Post by bluemoth on Sept 8, 2016 6:47:53 GMT -8
Will you guys and gals please take this seriously just go read the article on the DNA study that was whiten about at the TBRC. One of the scientists is trying to hide the results but the other refused to keep quiet and told the TBRC the results. Stop arguing about the "we need a body" nonsense and go and read it. We do not need a body because Bigfoot samples have already been studied with amazing results. Other scientists in the US may be hiding results of tests as well. The RMSO sent hair samples suspected to be from a Bigfoot to two colleges and one museum. They were told they could not be identified by all three of these places. But could there be a cover up going on here in most of America's scientific community so the public is kept in the dark about the truth? Some brave TV news reporter out there needs to do a report on this so the truth will be known to all.
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Sept 8, 2016 8:04:22 GMT -8
Will you guys and gals please take this seriously just go read the article on the DNA study that was whiten about at the TBRC. One of the scientists is trying to hide the results but the other refused to keep quiet and told the TBRC the results. Stop arguing about the "we need a body" nonsense and go and read it. We do not need a body because Bigfoot samples have already been studied with amazing results. Other scientists in the US may be hiding results of tests as well. The RMSO sent hair samples suspected to be from a Bigfoot to two colleges and one museum. They were told they could not be identified by all three of these places. But could there be a cover up going on here in most of America's scientific community so the public is kept in the dark about the truth? Some brave TV news reporter out there needs to do a report on this so the truth will be known to all. Why not get a body if one is purportedly so conveniently obtained? I do take it seriously. If I had the time, I'd go to that fjord on Vancouver Islands, and I'd get one myself! John Tennent said there were no Polyura Jupiter on Makira- so I gave him a body. That pretty much solves everything.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2016 8:26:45 GMT -8
Bluemoth,
I am taking it seriously. If the existence of such a creature could be proven it would be the discovery of the century. But that's the problem without a live or dead specimen you can't prove it. Are these things intelligent enough to bury their dead? We don't know! It's a mystery.
|
|
|
Post by exoticimports on Sept 8, 2016 8:57:28 GMT -8
Bluemoth, I am taking it seriously. If the existence of such a creature could be proven it would be the discovery of the century. But that's the problem without a live or dead specimen you can't prove it. Are these things intelligent enough to bury their dead? We don't know! It's a mystery. I saw Harry and the Hendersons. The "no body" works two ways. NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation continues to claim there are no cougars in NY, despite photos. And no bodies. Somebody is going to get them a body and that will end that charade.
|
|